|
Nyte2
Guest
|
 |
« on: January 10, 2008, 03:49:16 am » |
|
hello there again... can i ask other further questions?...
why don't make Rockbox as a video player as well as ZMPlayer?.. coz for me, RockBox is more stable than ZMplayer...
p/s: If RockBox will be modified as photo,music and video player...can it open flv and avi as well??...
Me just asking and wondering.... =]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
arctu
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2008, 05:20:52 am » |
|
rockbox can't run avi files and many other video files that zmplayer could.
rockbox = music player. zmplayer = movie player.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aozame
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2008, 07:48:55 pm » |
|
rockbox its not only music player, it can view jpegs, edit text, and runs gameboy roms!!!( the problem are buttons who are so "limited")
if you installed the codec and viewer maybe it can play video...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
arctu
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2008, 08:35:13 am » |
|
what i meant above is the main purpose of the software. Rockbox edit text and view jpegs but it doesn't do the job good. (don't even talk about the gb emulator).
there's no codec for rockbox. all "codecs" are precompiled in the rockbox executable.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
soccerholic
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2008, 12:43:13 pm » |
|
you can't compare it,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Taurnil
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2008, 03:57:57 pm » |
|
it's like makin' a comparison between rokr e2 and a1200: maybe have similar uses, but they're focused into different markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NightStalker1993
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 11:33:20 pm » |
|
Winamp vs. PowerDVD,which is better...
ure comparing the same thing -.-"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
error398
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2008, 12:02:55 am » |
|
K-Lite and Jukebox, there is too much different
u cannot compare it..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CyberPunk
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2008, 04:48:34 am » |
|
what?? gameboy roms?? :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
keaglez
Indonesian Motolover
PHD modder
Karma: 61
 Offline
Posts: 2562
http://jeffri.net
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2008, 04:53:42 am » |
|
LOL, this topics is quite fun...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best regards, Jeffri H.  |
|
|
|
Nyte2
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2008, 06:23:07 am » |
|
ok²... i've got it now...thx all...u guys are the best!...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darkslider
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2008, 04:56:34 pm » |
|
what?? gameboy roms?? :|
yeah...game boy roms but control is bad( |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aozame
Guest
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2008, 08:03:44 pm » |
|
yes, the control is very bad. gameboy uses 8 button and because its emulator, it need menu button so this emulator need 9 button. but theres only 7 button in rockbox and the frame rate is veeryyy slooow, maybe because the ram and the processor in e2.
maybe someone can fix it? because is so great it anybody can
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
arctu
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2008, 10:36:15 pm » |
|
nope. the reason for its slowness is because of the SDL.
The SDL lib that we used on our phones does not support 18bpp natively therefore for every frame, 16bpp is converted to 18bpp... imagine the slowness... (:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aozame
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2008, 11:18:37 pm » |
|
well i dont get it, but what about the gameboy emulator in java?? its slow but not slow as like in rockbox
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
