|
Title: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: Nyte2 on January 10, 2008, 03:49:16 am hello there again... can i ask other further questions?...
why don't make Rockbox as a video player as well as ZMPlayer?.. coz for me, RockBox is more stable than ZMplayer... p/s: If RockBox will be modified as photo,music and video player...can it open flv and avi as well??... Me just asking and wondering.... =] Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: arctu on January 10, 2008, 05:20:52 am rockbox can't run avi files and many other video files that zmplayer could.
rockbox = music player. zmplayer = movie player. Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: aozame on January 10, 2008, 07:48:55 pm rockbox its not only music player, it can view jpegs, edit text, and runs gameboy roms!!!( the problem are buttons who are so "limited")
if you installed the codec and viewer maybe it can play video... Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: arctu on January 11, 2008, 08:35:13 am what i meant above is the main purpose of the software. Rockbox edit text and view jpegs but it doesn't do the job good. (don't even talk about the gb emulator).
there's no codec for rockbox. all "codecs" are precompiled in the rockbox executable. Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: soccerholic on January 11, 2008, 12:43:13 pm you can't compare it,
Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: Taurnil on January 11, 2008, 03:57:57 pm it's like makin' a comparison between rokr e2 and a1200: maybe have similar uses, but they're focused into different markets.
Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: NightStalker1993 on January 13, 2008, 11:33:20 pm Winamp vs. PowerDVD,which is better...
ure comparing the same thing -.-" Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: error398 on January 14, 2008, 12:02:55 am K-Lite and Jukebox, there is too much different
u cannot compare it.. Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: CyberPunk on January 14, 2008, 04:48:34 am what?? gameboy roms?? :|
Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: keaglez on January 14, 2008, 04:53:42 am LOL, this topics is quite fun...
Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: Nyte2 on January 14, 2008, 06:23:07 am ok²... i've got it now...thx all...u guys are the best!... :)
Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: Darkslider on January 20, 2008, 04:56:34 pm what?? gameboy roms?? :| yeah...game boy romsbut control is bad( Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: aozame on January 20, 2008, 08:03:44 pm yes, the control is very bad. gameboy uses 8 button and because its emulator, it need menu button so this emulator need 9 button. but theres only 7 button in rockbox and the frame rate is veeryyy slooow, maybe because the ram and the processor in e2.
maybe someone can fix it? because is so great it anybody can Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: arctu on January 20, 2008, 10:36:15 pm nope. the reason for its slowness is because of the SDL.
The SDL lib that we used on our phones does not support 18bpp natively therefore for every frame, 16bpp is converted to 18bpp... imagine the slowness... (: Title: Re: RockBox vs ZMPlayer??? Post by: aozame on January 20, 2008, 11:18:37 pm well i dont get it, but what about the gameboy emulator in java?? its slow but not slow as like in rockbox
|